Friday, December 9, 2016

The Origin of Safe Spaces and Political Psychiatry

Safe Spaces - Not what they seem to be.
Indoctrination Bubbles.                                                   Most universities in North America have become indoctrination centers for Cultural Marxism.or even worse they produce dehumanized programmable humans. Their now salient well known political characteristics as "safe spaces" and avoiding "triggering" are to me  are obviously derived from Biomed Psychotherapeutic methodology.. Probably "micro-aggressions" and a few other key concepts are an outgrowth of this methodology as well.

Biomed Psychiatry found that it was not sufficient just to lobotomize a person emotions (relieving them of their "suffering") and impairing their cognitive judgment.  Patients have a disastrous tendency to want to become well  which accounts for one the chief reasons for  non drug compliance.The mad may be crazy but they are not stupid, they know instinctively that their their problems are not being solved.   So the BioMed Industry  needed to develop concurrent psychosocial methods to enforce behaviour control. Thus BioMed Psychiatry developed an Ideology and methodology concurrent with the actual practice of distributing drugs which main functions can be describes as to  impact negatively or restrict the functions of the prefrontal cortex.

Happy Face Fascism in Psychosocial Treatments Safe spaces are neither safe nor do they have "space" for growth.  The safe space is an indoctrination or brainwashing  bubble to keep "disruptive" influences out and to keep the subjects in while they undergo indoctrination . Modern Universities are just "psychosocial treatment" on a grander scale. Since I am a product of a successful psychotherapeutic process, long ago I easily recognized Biomed psychotherapy as anti-therapy or fake psychotherapy. It's purpose is to effect behaviour control and compliance in the medicated person.
The context is that nothing can be done for the subject's perceived emotional problem - the drug is supposed to be taking care of that. The leaders of such groups or individual treatments thus concentrate on thought induction  in the participants to effect behavior control upon the person designated as  being a debilitated or somewhat psycho-crippled person. On of the key edicts of all such groups is "Happy-Face Fascism" in which no negativity (which might be curative) is allowed to be expressed. The modern University counterpart be 'Happy Face Marxism"  or no Anti-Marxist Thought allowed and all such thought would be demonized as as the usual racism, sexism,. whatever-ism etc.
 I know all of this information from many years of sitting in on psychosocial groups and getting reports from many participants of such groups or treatments in Hospitals, social outreach programs etc. I have extensive street experience.  What I have personally complied is very extensive and not well known or understood by the general public.  
This is from the DSM-5 recommendations: 
 "psychosocial treatments are social skills training, cognitive-behavioral therapy, cognitive remediation, and social cognition training.

Psychosocial treatments are currently oriented according to the recovery model. According to this model, the goals of treatment for a person with schizophrenia are as follows:

    To have few or stable symptoms
    Not to be hospitalized

To manage his or her own funds and medications
    To be either working or in school at least half-time"

"Few or stable symptoms " means to have had the "problem" emotions removed. This formula is easily adapted to any ordinary person. In fact this formula as with University students can operate without diagnosis or psych meds . It's a formula for social control.
The word "recovery"is a misnomer or Newspeak. The 'recovery person' has not recovered to anything. They are in fact disabled or in a state of personal dsyfunction . It is more like a "Compliance Model"

In real psychotherapy of course, the psychosocial experience is quite painful and far from safe a patient volunteers for this from positive encouragement from their peers even before thy begin the process, they want pain because they want life and once they experience the process they want more of it  So of course negative experience is confronted and not avoided and there are no such thing as "triggers" only things that the patient wants so work on to advance themselves.
All of these attitudes required to even start this kind of real work have been poisoned in the modern social environment by the ever pervasive ideology of From BioMed Psychiatry. This is analogous to how the idea of what a University is supposed to be has been poisoned by  the ideologies of Cultural Marxism. 

The Development of Safe Spaces and Beyond
The idea of safe spaces was first introduced by Psychologist  Kurt Lewin in the 1930's   and this concept was found again when some gay activists tried to establish refuges or safe zones in bars in the '60's
It then became a key key concept in Biomed Ideology in the 80's and '90's . Concurrently Cultural Marxism made a strong insurgence in the '90s  which worked hand in hand with BioMed Psychiatry  in trying to enforce behavior control and medication compliance on psychiatric patients. I was fortunate that I was cured at the end of the '70s because after that real psychotherapy mostly died or was eroded away and was replaced by psychosocial treatments based on the Biomed Ideology.
Unfortunately Biomed Ideology has permeated mainstream psychology so the even those psychotherapies that are not Biomed oriented have been doomed to failure  by the unwitting and unconscious  incorporation of Biomed Ideology which is is anathema to becoming and being well and weller than well.
I see cultural Marxism in the 2010's as re-surging  because of  the cementing of biomed methods in the population and the complete corruption and co-option between government and the BioMed Industry.
Currently in Canada it seems the entire Health Services, Educational Services  and Government Departments are all converted to both Cultural Marxism and Biomed ideology  in all aspect's.Even the high schools have political indoctrination programs using the pseudoscience of 'Implicit Bias".  I will go into more detail later n some of my explorations.

I would just give a general warning - be careful with any interactions with any doctor, health worker, educational worker, teachers, health services etc. . Those who should be guarding the gates are working for the other side. They are all recruiting for the BioMed Industry and almost all doctors are prescribing Psych Meds off label and they will prescribe them with no regard for even despite black box warnings. There are no Public Guardians, none whatsoever. The few that should be there, that are even listed on Government brochures  - they are not  there, you will know more than they do..There have been new draconian compliance laws introduced and new "compliance directors appointed for various regions- this has happened in the last five years an all an new advocacy. No one will warn or inform the public - they only real information  anyone can get is by searching for oneself on the internet. If you see something about Bereavement Groups at the local library - (Red Warning)  don't go. Most long term care facilitates are committing mass personality destructions which  brings body deterioration and mortality at about a 160 -200 percent  increase.
Be Warned. Caveat Emptor. It's a   giant ruthless machine. 
Here is ultimately is another type of "Unholy Alliance", the alliance of Cultural Marxism and Biomed Ideology  both of which have the ultimate goal of destroying the full functioning of human beings , impairing their judgment and keeping them under control of government indoctrination.
Now here is an article by Bruce Levine on 10 of the Worst Political Abuses of U.S. Psychiatry and Psychology

I would like to call attention to the last five less sensational or controversial items on the list which in the author says   "However, the mainstream media has routinely neglected the ordinary and everyday political use and abuse of U.S. psychiatry and psychology to stigmatize and disempower groups, enable dehumanizing institutions, compel compliance, marginalize dissent, depoliticize, and maintain the status quo"
  •  6. Subverting U.S. Soldiers’ Resistance to the Military-Industrial Complex
  •  7. Enabling Authoritarian Standard Schooling
  •  8. Depoliticizing Normal Reactions to Dehumanizing Employment
  •  9. Medicating Noncompliance and Marginalizing Anti-Authoritarians
  • 10. Controlling Uncared about and Discarded Populations
 So I would like to add #11 to the list

Except for the elites of course and the management class. The extent of the BioMed Industry is far beyond  the public awareness , it is in everything and so is cultural Marxism and the goal of both is to be everywhere and control everyone.
Do not get lost in the details, it is all one thing - behaviour control by the elites. This is not a war of ideologies. Cultural Marxism and the BioMed Industry are mechanisms of control and profit for economic elites. Defeating their ideology does not defeat them. It is a war of absolute power versus the people or versus distributed power.
Defeating Globalist ideology is just whack-a-mole, it is just the hired tool of Globalists, easily rehired and renewed by them.  Economic Globalism itself must be defeated for human freedom to prevail. 

No comments:

Post a Comment